<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frame progress &#8212; finished up the rear triangle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexwetmore.org/archives/596/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/596</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wetmore</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/596/comment-page-1#comment-74994</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Wetmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/11/23/frame-progress-finished-up-the-rear-triangle.aspx#comment-74994</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I hadn&#039;&#039;t seen that detail before in their manual, I must have looked at an older version.

It doesn&#039;&#039;t hurt the hub to have the anti-rotation in the wrong angle, but it can push the hub out of the dropouts in low gears under high torque.  With my wheel position that can be a problem if I don&#039;&#039;t use a good QR (sharp serrations on the nut and a strong steel QR mechanism are a must), but with one it isn&#039;&#039;t an issue.  It is a tradeoff that I&#039;&#039;d make again if I were building the bike again today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I hadn&#8221;t seen that detail before in their manual, I must have looked at an older version.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8221;t hurt the hub to have the anti-rotation in the wrong angle, but it can push the hub out of the dropouts in low gears under high torque.  With my wheel position that can be a problem if I don&#8221;t use a good QR (sharp serrations on the nut and a strong steel QR mechanism are a must), but with one it isn&#8221;t an issue.  It is a tradeoff that I&#8221;d make again if I were building the bike again today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gatouille</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/596/comment-page-1#comment-74914</link>
		<dc:creator>Gatouille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/11/23/frame-progress-finished-up-the-rear-triangle.aspx#comment-74914</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Information about Rohloff axle plate (attempts to rotate under load) : position of bolt is good for eyes but bad for maintain of wheel.
Position in front of rear wheel axle is forbiddden with these type of dropout = dangerous.
See this document, page 30 : http://www.rohloff.de/uploads/media/Benutzerinfo_en.pdf

Best regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Information about Rohloff axle plate (attempts to rotate under load) : position of bolt is good for eyes but bad for maintain of wheel.<br />
Position in front of rear wheel axle is forbiddden with these type of dropout = dangerous.<br />
See this document, page 30 : <a href="http://www.rohloff.de/uploads/media/Benutzerinfo_en.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.rohloff.de/uploads/media/Benutzerinfo_en.pdf</a></p>
<p>Best regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Broach</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/596/comment-page-1#comment-4587</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Broach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/11/23/frame-progress-finished-up-the-rear-triangle.aspx#comment-4587</guid>
		<description>Great creative problem solving!  The Rohloff mount and bottom bracket are really clever and just seem perfect for the job.  The rear brake cable hanger is really nice looking, but I wonder about flex unless the cable run is close to perfectly straight to the straddle cable yoke.  I would also worry about a loaded saddlebag bending those long, skinny wire arms.  But, it will probably be a non-issue, and there&#039;&#039;s nothing stopping you from using a conventional hanger from the binder bolt later.

What size are those knobbies, and how long are the chainstays?  Thanks as always for sharing your work! It&#039;&#039;s inspirational for sure!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great creative problem solving!  The Rohloff mount and bottom bracket are really clever and just seem perfect for the job.  The rear brake cable hanger is really nice looking, but I wonder about flex unless the cable run is close to perfectly straight to the straddle cable yoke.  I would also worry about a loaded saddlebag bending those long, skinny wire arms.  But, it will probably be a non-issue, and there&#8217;&#8217;s nothing stopping you from using a conventional hanger from the binder bolt later.</p>
<p>What size are those knobbies, and how long are the chainstays?  Thanks as always for sharing your work! It&#8217;&#8217;s inspirational for sure!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/596/comment-page-1#comment-4586</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/11/23/frame-progress-finished-up-the-rear-triangle.aspx#comment-4586</guid>
		<description>i like that dummy axle idea, much more elegant than using a square (like i have also).    now that i have a lathe/mill i can make fun things like that!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like that dummy axle idea, much more elegant than using a square (like i have also).    now that i have a lathe/mill i can make fun things like that!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
